Contact Us · About CADRE · Privacy

Unvetted Symbol
This document does not offer formal policy guidance from the Office of Special Education Programs at the United States Department of Education.

This site is funded by:
Ideas that Work, U.S. Office of Special Education Programs
This web site complies with section 508
Consortium for Appropriate Dispute Resolution (CADRE)

Research & Evaluation


Dispute Resolution (DR) Procedures, Data Collection, and Caseloads This study reviews state databases and examines the ratio of dispute resolution cases per 10,000. A CADRE Publication

Dispute Resolution Activities: State Data Collection The Phase I study conducted as a part of NASDSE's subcontract with CADRE was a national screening of the current status of ADR data collection procedures carried out within the states. Following the completion of the Phase I study, a more in-depth study of state ADR data collection procedures was conducted within ten states.

Dispute Resolution Database Structure and Elements To help facilitate the development of dispute resolution case management database systems, CADRE and NASDSE formed a design team for the purpose of determining the necessary data elements and database structure(s). Participants from Illinois, Texas, Indiana, Maine, Idaho, Washington State, and the Western RRC assisted with this task. This paper describes the features of a system that can assist states to collect comprehensive management information across complaints, mediation, and due process hearings.

Dispute Resolution Under IDEA 1997: Mediation Survey IDEA 1997 requires that states offer mediation in conjunction with the filing of a due process hearing. The purpose of this inquiry was to learn about other times states offer mediation to resolve disputes.

Evaluating the Fiscal Effectiveness of ADR Processes: Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) - Return on Investment (ROI) Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes have resulted in positive outcomes for parents, students who receive special education and related services, advocates, school district staff, and others. Persons in dispute are provided opportunities to have their disagreements dealt with promptly. The anxiety of long waits in the due process/litigation system is relieved, often times with low, or no cost, professional services provided to all parties. And perhaps most importantly, ADR has provided a process for effectively mending broken relationships and set a course for positive future interactions.

Initial Review of Research Literature on ADR in Special Education This article describes a literature search process employed to identify research in ADR and special education, organizes some initial search results, briefly summarizes them, and raises important questions for the purpose of generating a future research agenda.

Mediating at the Maryland Office of Administrative Hearings The Maryland Office of Administrative Hearings provides special education mediation services to the State Department of Education, Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services. This brief article spotlights the service and its recent success. For FY 2003, the office received 425 special education mediation requests. 298 cases went to mediation and 193 of those settled for an agreement rate of 65%.

Michigan Special Education Mediation Program Receives Positive Evaluations Recent mediation participants completed an evaluation form that the Michigan Special Education Mediation Program (MSEMP) provides to all mediation participants. The results of these evaluations are compiled quarterly and used to assist program staff with maintaining high-quality mediation services for special education disputes. The evaluation asks several questions with short, prompted answers, as well as gives participants the opportunity to provide longer, written feedback. The article summarizes answers to key questions on evaluations received during the July 1, 2000 - March 31, 2001 time period from 66 mediation participants.

National Dispute Resolution Use and Effectiveness Study CADRE partner, NASDSE has been systematically gathering dispute resolution information from SEAs to analyze formative (process) and summative (outcome) information on the use and effectiveness of conflict resolution procedures. The National Dispute Resolution Use and Effectiveness Study reviews previously published research, examines recently collected data, and makes important recommendations. A CADRE Publication. This document was published in September 2004. For more information on IDEA 2004, please click here.

Oregon Mediation Program Successful Thanks to Valerie Miller and Suzy Harris from the Oregon Department of Education for this data on outcomes related to special education mediation in Oregon.

State Mediation Systems - A NASDSE Report This report is a brief analysis of the results of a survey of State Directors of Special Education on their state mediation systems. It was conducted as a follow-up to previous Project FORUM documents on this topic (Ahearn, 1997, Ahearn, 1994, Schrag, 1996). Responses to selected items of the survey are summarized in the attached table.

Status of Annual Dispute Resolution Effectiveness and Impact Measurement To assist in a comprehensive nationwide review of ADR strategies being used in the states, NASDSE, as a CADRE partner, obtained information during Year 1 from each state regarding ADR data collection procedures, including complaints resolution, mediation, and due process hearings.

Texas Education Agency Special Education Mediation Program Scores High The overwhelming majority of parents and school district staff participating in the Texas Education Agency's (TEA) Special Education Mediation Program found it to be highly effective, expressed strong satisfaction with the process, and were willing to use the mediation services again or recommend it to others according to a survey of results which looked at 603 surveys over a two year period of time (1998-2000).

The Impact of Parent/Family Involvement on Student Outcomes: An Annotated Bibliography of Research from the Past Decade In this bibliography of research published during the past decade, we have grouped studies into three related areas: studies that evaluate the effectiveness of school-based programs and interventions intended to promote parent/family involvement on student outcomes; studies that evaluate family behaviors and characteristics and their effect on student outcomes; and studies that analyze parent/family involvement research. A CADRE Publication. This document was published in December 2002. For more information on IDEA 2004, please click here.

Using Participant Feedback to Evaluate and Improve Quality in Mediation This resource guide presents an overview of mediation evaluation with a specific focus on how to make use of participant questionnaires in evaluating mediation programs. A CADRE Publication. This document was published in December 2002. For more information on IDEA 2004, please click here.

What Participants are Saying About Oregon’s Mediation Process A snapshot of the Oregon Department of Education, Office of Special Education survey of potential and actual mediation participants during 2002.

Click here to go to top of page